![sex video porno gay busnis sean cody sex video porno gay busnis sean cody](https://imgs1cdn.adultempire.com/products/43/1756543h.jpg)
There are just too many variables and too few data points. The truth is that no one knows how risky this is. My god, look at articles about Mason Wyler!) Maybe bareback is “hotter,” but at what QJ201: PCR tests are standard in porn and many sites proudly brag that they use them, although I don’t know that Sean Cody has said anything. The viewers start slut shaming and condemning. If they see sex without condoms, particularly in videos accompanied by descriptions of how great it feels in comparison (“There was no friction! I could really feel it!” C’mon, Sean Cody! The silly disclaimer doesn’t override that!), there is a chance they’ll be more compelled to experiment accordingly.įinally, I hope that avid defenders and masturbators of bareback are equally inclined to watch the videos and read the blogs of the very models they jacked to getting it raw as they talk about the moment they got their positive test back, the side effects of the medications, etc., etc. Especially gay kids- because god knows they aren’t getting their information from as-religious-as-public-schools-can-get-away-with sex ed courses. And though children aren’t the target audience and directors/studios do not need to cater their flicks to them, we must remember that kids learn about sex by viewing porn. While these adults are technically competent under the law and can sign their own bareback shoot contract, in such cases as the latter archetypal broke-and-down, bareback just borders on manipulative and unethical.Ģ.) Anyone can click the “I am over 18” buttons to gain access to any porn site. The two big issues this commenter has with bareback-ġ.) There are a handful (and then some) of porn stars who really handle themselves as savvy business-types, but there are also the young, broke, desperate (and sometimes unstable-) models who are really just looking for some cash. With that being said, I would never vote for or support that type of legislation because it takes away choices from performers, who are adults and should be able to make informed decisions. It’s very callous to say, but those two idea would do more to protect negative performers from HIV infection than mandatory condom use.
![sex video porno gay busnis sean cody sex video porno gay busnis sean cody](https://adabgmwwup.cloudimg.io/v7/_queerty-prodweb_/2021/05/CS7Cr2vUwAAN8Fh.jpeg)
Or make it mandatory to serosort performers.
![sex video porno gay busnis sean cody sex video porno gay busnis sean cody](https://cdn77-pic.xnxx-cdn.com/videos/thumbs169xnxxposter/8b/e7/3c/8be73c174988fa92b9181994cbec0f8c/8be73c174988fa92b9181994cbec0f8c.25.jpg)
Instead of mandatory condoms use, why not implement a ban on HIV + performers? I think it’s more dangerous to have sex safe with a positive guy than to bareback with someone that is also negative. That isn’t going to help up further our cause. Both my partner and myself are neg and it bothers me that gay men are the ones reinforcing the idea that gay sex equals HIV. I’m an adult and I don’t use condoms in my relationship because I don’t have to.
Sex video porno gay busnis sean cody movie#
Is my favorite movie of all time, but I don’t kill people in their sleep. Are we really at the point when just because something offends your sensibilities, it shouldn’t exist? I say we’re all adults and we make our own choices. You and you alone are responsible for your actions. What is the equvilent for straight porn? By depicting unsafe sex in straight porn, said porn companies are responsible for the rising pregnancy rate? It’s silly. I thinks it’s more dangerous put forth the assumption that unprotected sex between two men equals HIV infection than it is to depict it in a porn film.